Home | RRS Link | Hiking and Camping | Renewable Energy | Hiking, Camping and Backpacking Store | Healthy Organic Living | Hiking Information | Solar Energy | Wetland Ecosystem Information | Renewable Fuels | About the Forest Wonderer | Wildlife and Nature Photography Conservation | Preservation and Conservation of the Ecosystem | Global Warming Information | Wildlife and Nature Picture Store

Environmental Protection Vision And Confusion
Author: Ian Dennis

 
Many environmental protection lawsuits turn on the question of who has standing; are the legal issues limited to property
owners, or does the general public have a right to intervene?

Environmental protection law is a body of law, which is a
system of complex and interlocking statutes, common law,
treaties, conventions, regulations and policies which seeks to
protect the natural environment which may be affected, impacted or endangered by human activities.

 One of the earliest environmental protection lawsuits to
establish that citizens may sue for environmental and aesthetic
harms was Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power
Commission, decided in 1965 by the Second Circuit Court of
Appeals. The case helped halt the construction of a power plant
on Storm King Mountain in New York State.

The Environmental Movement has three main roots: Conservation
of natural resources, preservation of wilderness and the
movement to reduce pollution and improve urban life.

Some people are skeptical of the environmental movement and
feel that it is more deeply rooted in politics than science.
Although there have been serious debates about climate change
and effects of some pesticides and herbicides that mimic animal
sex steroids, science has shown that the claims of
environmentalists have creedence, that we are indeed
experiencing human-induced climate change, and that there are
serious side effects in the over-application of pesticides and
herbicides.

Largely due to this political critique and confusion, and a
growing concern with the environmental health problems caused
by pesticides, some serious biologists and ecologists created
the scientific ecology movement which would not confuse
empirical data with visions of a desirable future world.

However, the environmental movement today persists in many
smaller local groups, usually within ecoregions, furthering
spiritual and aesthetic values which Thoreau or those who
rewrote Chief Seattle's Reply would recognize.

The visions and confusions, however, persist. The new tribalist
vision of society, for example, echoes the concerns of the
original environmentalists to a degree. And the more local
groups increasingly find that they benefit from collaboration,
e.g. on consensus decision making methods, or making
simultaneous policy, or relying on common legal resources, or
even sometimes a common glossary.

Despite all the political talk and dispute among environmental
groups; we can all agree on one thing: Each individual must
take good care of mother earth while he or she is here – a
borrowed time that eventually is passed on to the next
generation.

Thank you for your time.


About The Author: Find more information about Environmental
Protection http://www.environmental-protection-e.com on the
Environmental Protection website. Check it out!

Enter supporting content here


Kevin%20DobersteinQuantcast

eagle.gif

Looking for a blog about wildlife and nature conservation and preservation? Try The Forest Wonderer Blog, your portal to wildlife and nature news. Usually updated daily. You can easily add it to your My Yahoo, MSN, Google home pages by clicking on one of the buttons on the blog. Click on this link The Forest Wonderer Blog to take a look at it.

Save the Forests